Let me begin by saying that I know very little about Suze Orman. I’m not familiar with her overall fiscal philosophy, her background, etc. In fact, before today, everything I knew about Suze Orman I learned in a recent SNL skit.
So I watched today’s show with no preconceived notions.
In general, I agreed with most of what she had to say and her recommendations for dealing with children and money. But I completely disagree with her advice to one caller on the subject of allowance. And on that topic I really, really disagree with her.
So I was curious, Suze is a financial guru but what does she know about kids? Turns out, Suze doesn’t have kids.
I know that a lot of parents agree with Suze on the subject of allowance: children should have to earn their allowance. To be clear, I don’t disagree with this position. I believe, very strongly, that children should have to work around the house. My children have always had chores. In addition regular chores, they are expected to perform any additional task requested of them.
So, while I understand the thinking behind the advice to tie allowance to chores and the desire to teach the correlation between work and pay in preparation for their adult lives, I see this way of thinking as overly simplistic, too linear, and materialistic. It completely discounts the complexities and subtleties of the human being.
For one thing, children are not miniature adults. Any parent knows that the lessons a child takes away from an experience isn’t always predictable. Much depends on the age, maturity, and personality of a child. In addition, since when was it considered an absolute given that being a good little wage-earner is what every parent wants for their child. Then, too, there’s the question of whether every action we perform should be viewed in terms of potential income.
I would argue that considering allowance to be an earned wage (Suze advocated paying children $0.10/minute of labor performed) will result in selfish, materialistic, money-driven adults.
I certainly want my children to understand money, to have an honest and positive relationship with their finances but I’d hate for them to grow up to be obsessed with the acquisition and accumulation of money above everything else.
I’ve written a number of posts about how we deal with our kids & money and I have several updates and future posts planned so be sure to subscribe (via email or in a reader) to my blog posts or bookmark my blog and come visit again soon.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!No related posts.







One Comment
Nice post. In fact, your posts all appear to be well-written. As for Suze’s ideas, I definitely see what you mean here. And you’re right, I think that this is something that Suze *might* be over her head on. But then again, maybe not.
I think that there is a very good concept that you have of providing fixed amounts of money and giving the Daughter the complete ability/discretion with this money. Unfortunately, I can see the point that attaching money may not be the best thing. The reality is that you could probably do both; in fact, it sounds like you do.
The Daughter has both paying jobs and an allowance. Perhaps this is the best approach and maybe the key here is to make sure that the plain old allowance is not so much money that the child feels he/she is entitled to not ever see out additional income or save up.…