$$: No-Spend

No money spent though I have spent a good deal of time “win­dow” shop­ping (or should I call it “tab” shop­ping since I pre­fer to open mul­ti­ple tabs within one browser win­dow).  Either way, you get the point — I did a lot of look­ing online for men’s cot­ton boxer shorts.

The Son has decided that he def­i­nitely wants to make the switch to box­ers.  In fact, for all intents and pur­poses, I think he has made the switch which means I need to get my hands on some more box­ers, in a hurry.  Four pair of box­ers is not going to get him very far and I see laun­dry issues and poten­tial melt­downs in our future if I don’t get this taken care of right away.

Boxer shorts, thank­fully, are very pop­u­lar these days so there really isn’t a short­age of sources.  On the other hand, if you’ve seen pop­u­lar styles these days, you’ll know that among the 2–35 set, boxer shorts are more of a fash­ion acces­sory than an under­gar­ment.  The Son has no inter­est in boxer-shorts-as-fashion-accessory.  At the very min­i­mum, The Son wants shorts is sub­tle stripes and plaids; he’d clearly pre­fer solid colors.

And so, a fairly wide field quickly becomes decid­edly more narrow.

Not only that but there seems to be three dis­tinct style sub­sets within the men’s boxer shorts cat­e­gory:  back cen­ter seam (i.e. the Joseph Abboud box­ers I bought), the “3-panel” back (i.e. the TH shorts), and the seam­less back (haven’t sam­pled these yet).

The Son liked the JA shorts well enough but he liked the TH shorts even bet­ter.  Appar­ently they were more com­fort­able though he was at a loss as far as artic­u­lat­ing the rea­son why.  [Of course, that’s no big sur­prise to me as The Son, unlike the stereo­typ­i­cal Aspie, is pretty non-verbal.]  My guess is that the TH box­ers were com­fort­able because of the 3-panel back and over­all “fuller” cut.

So now at least I know what I’m not look­ing for:

  • noth­ing in a blend; they must be 100% cot­ton (this is my require­ment but it’s firm; cot­ton is breath­able and much health­ier over­all for the skin espe­cially in so del­i­cate and inti­mate an area)
  • noth­ing in a wild or col­or­ful pat­tern; plain col­ors would be most preferable
  • no cen­ter back seams; I’d like to get my hands on a pair of no-seam box­ers to give those a try as it appears that sev­eral brands/designers make this style (Nau­tica, for example)

The one style/design dif­fer­ence that The Son hasn’t expressed no opin­ion on is the waist­band — he didn’t seem to have a pref­er­ence between the JA soft elas­tic waist­band over the TH fab­ric wrapped waist­band.  Thank good­ness for minor miracles.

So, despite the rather large num­ber of boxer shorts avail­able, I’m hav­ing a tough time find­ing a source that I think he might be able to live with, much less find per­fect.  Out­lined below is what I’ve dis­cov­ered through my online research.  The next step is to head out in the car and do a “lit­tle” real-life research.

–  Gap, Old Navy, Aero­postale, and Amer­i­can Eagle Out­fit­ters all carry cot­ton box­ers but none of them carry plain box­ers.  Gap comes the clos­est with fairly sub­tle stripes and plaids.  I plan pop into the local Gap Out­let store but don’t expect to find what I’m look­ing for; I’ve shopped there for box­ers for The Nephew and know from expe­ri­ence that pat­terns, the wilder the bet­ter, rule the day.

– Eddie Bauer car­ries cot­ton boxer shorts, mostly in stripes and plaids, but they are sold only online and through the cat­a­log.  I’m assum­ing that means I will not find any in the Eddie Bauer Out­let store.  At this point, I’m still very much in the “sam­pling” stage; order­ing online and pay­ing ship­ping is out of the question.

– Target.com shows that their Merona brand box­ers come in all-cotton but no details are given regard­ing style par­tic­u­lars — trim fit?  full-cut?  back seam?  3-panel back?  I’ll stop and check them out but I’m not going to hold my breath.  In my expe­ri­ence, noth­ing Tar­get makes is very gen­er­ously cut — great for some things, not so much for others.

– Jockey seems to have elim­i­nated their clas­sic full cut box­ers in all-cotton.  The only Jockey full cut box­ers I could find on their web­site were their blends.  Why they would do that is a total mys­tery to me and hon­estly, it strikes fear in my heart.  The Hus­band wears Jockey full cut box­ers in 100% cot­ton; he has quite a sup­ply but some of them are get­ting close to being just a lit­tle too air-conditioned and will have to be trashed before too long.  As much as I don’t hate shop­ping and do enjoy a chal­lenge, I really don’t want to spend all of ’10 look­ing for boxer shorts for the men in my life.

– And what is it about depart­ment stores?  Have all mid-level depart­ment stores banded together and decided that they will carry  noth­ing but cheaply made poly­ester blend cloth­ing?  For good­ness sake, even Tar­get car­ries 100% cot­ton box­ers!  And why in the world would a guy choose to carry his pack­age day in and day out in poly­ester?  Makes as much sense to me as per­fumed tam­pons.

Okay, rant over.  My chal­lenge tomor­row: hit the stores in hopes of find­ing an afford­able and depend­able source of cot­ton boxer shorts in solid col­ors (or sub­tle stripes/plaids) in a full-cut style with 3-panel back.  I’m going into this with a pos­i­tive atti­tude — I will find what I’m look­ing for.

In con­clu­sion, today was a no-spend day.  Tomor­row will not.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
Posted in Daily $$'s | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Missed $$: GE Stock through Sharebuilder

Share­builder — $150.00

I for­got to report on Mon­day that I’d trans­ferred $150 into my Share­builder account and that yes­ter­day that money was used to make another invest­ment pur­chase in form of GE stock.  Yesterday’s trans­ac­tion cost me $4.00 in fees and yielded another 8.8539 shares of GE stock at $16.49 per share.

Also on Mon­day, GE paid out div­i­dends.  Mine ($25.33) was auto­mat­i­cally rein­vested net­ting another 1.5723 shares.

Accord­ing to the Gains & Losses report in my Share­builder account, I know own 273.0807 shares of GE stock with a cur­rent mar­ket value of $4,421.18 for a life­time net gain of a whop­ping $37.33.  ;-)

At least today my net is a gain and not a loss.  I’m pretty used to that lit­tle total being red.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
Posted in Daily $$'s | Leave a comment

$$: Bonehead

Ever have one of those day?  Some­times I feel like bad days are the rule around here, not the exception.

Last night The Son came home and announced that he’d been smacked in the head with a bas­ket­ball and he thought he’d chipped a tooth.  I poked a fin­ger in his mouth like he was a 2yo and, sure enough, he’d chipped one of his lower bicus­pids. Darn.

So this morn­ing I called our den­tist and they fit him in this after­noon.  Nat­u­rally, that meant that The Hus­band had to come home early so I could have a car.  I picked up The Son from bas­ket­ball prac­tice and fought rush-hour traf­fic to the dentist’s office which was packed to the gills when we got there.  The recep­tion­ist announced they were run­ning a bit late.  The Son took the oppor­tu­nity to take a lit­tle cat nap on my shoul­der where he was snor­ing ever so slightly in my ear when they finally called his name.  He was in the chair for all of 5 min­utes, max.  The den­tist announced that there was noth­ing to bond to so he’d ground it down so it wouldn’t irri­tate The Son’s tongue and called it good (exactly what I’d sus­pected he’d do; it wasn’t a huge chip, but it was plenty rough).  The charge:  $0.00.  Gratis.  Nada.  Zilch.

I didn’t complain.

Since I had a car and had no idea of when I’d have one again and since I’d had the fore­thought to bring along the items I needed to return to T.J.Maxx and since the shop­ping had orig­i­nally been done on The Son’s behalf, I was a lit­tle bit heavy-handed in talk­ing him into being okay with me stop­ping quickly to return the dress shirt and the t-shirts and see if they had the t-shirts in the cor­rect size.  I also men­tioned that I’d look for more box­ers in the right size because, sur­prise! sur­prise!, he’s decided to switch to box­ers [thus spark­ing what will most likely amount to The Great Under­wear Hunt of ’10 — for those of you who remem­ber of the Under­wear Search of ’08 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8].  With any luck at all, this will be a mini ver­sion of that epic trea­sure hunt.

T.J.Maxx — ($48.40)

  • returned Ike Behar dress shirt — $29.99
  • returned Nau­tica under­shirts, size M — $14.99

T.J.Maxx — $22.57

And this is where the bone­head title comes in, after I’d lucked out and found a 3-pack of white crew­neck Nau­tica under­shirts in size Large, as I made my way to the cashier, a shiny object caught my eye and I, spur-of-the-moment, grabbed a stain­less steel cof­fee mug and had the clerk add it to my pur­chase.  The Daugh­ter had men­tioned want­ing one and this one looked per­fect.  It wasn’t.  It is stain­less steel and it does have a no-spill top and a nice han­dle.  But it’s plas­tic inside.  “buzzer sound indi­cat­ing wrong answer” Plas­tic inside is not accept­able.  It needs to be stain­less steel inside and out.  I noticed the prob­lem right away, before I even left the store but I felt like a bone­head and felt embar­rassed and, thus, decided to return it some other day.  After all, I’m going to have to keep look­ing for more box­ers, right?

  • 3-pack of Nau­tica under­shirts — $14.99
  • Stain­less Steel travel cof­fee mug — $5.99

The prob­lem with the box­ers is that The Son would clearly pre­fer plain box­ers.  I knew from the out­set that he wouldn’t want pat­terns (after all, a tiger can only change his stripes so much right?).  Switch­ing from a life­time of tight-y whiteys to box­ers was a leap I didn’t think he’d take but the addi­tional leap from solids to funky pat­terns like sham­rocks, lip­stick kisses, and skulls — no, he’s not going to go there.  The box­ers I found the other day aren’t solids but they aren’t pat­terns either.  The Joseph Abboud box­ers were var­i­ous, though over­all sub­tle, plaids.  The Tommy shorts were light blue with really small Tommy flag logos — as close as not-patterned as a pair of Tommy box­ers is ever going to get.  So now the chal­lenge becomes can I find him 100% cot­ton box­ers in the right size that are solids?

Now one really doesn’t have to look very deeply to see that the apple has fallen right under the tree.  Not only does The Hus­band pre­fer solid col­ored box­ers, he really prefers solid white.  He has a cou­ple pair in light blue and a few more in dark blue (both solids) and they are always the last ones to leave the drawer.

So I guess the first place to look in the Under­wear Hunt of ’10 is Jockey.  Do they still make 100% cot­ton box­ers?  But if I can find some, will The Son like them?  After all, the two pair he’s worn so far are cut dif­fer­ently than the Jockey shorts his dad wears.  I just know that if I buy a cou­ple pack­ages online, some­thing will go wrong and he’ll reject them.  But it could take me a week of Sun­days dri­ving all over town try­ing to track down solid-colored 100% cot­ton boxer shorts in size Small.

You know what?  I’m pack­ing it in for the the day and just going to bed.  The boxer shorts dilemma will still be here tomorrow.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
Posted in Daily $$'s | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

I’ve updated my About Me page

I real­ized my About Me page was out of date — being as that I’m not longer a home­school­ing mom nor am I gain­fully employed  :-P

Share and Enjoy:
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
Posted in Daily $$'s | Leave a comment

College Update

The Daugh­ter has now heard from 8 of the 12 col­leges to which she applied.  Another accep­tance and another schol­ar­ship offer arrived this past Sat­ur­day.  Her accep­tance rate is still at 100% but this par­tic­u­lar school isn’t in the run­ning: the approx­i­mate annual cost is $40,000 and the schol­ar­ship offer was $12,500.  That doesn’t bring her any­where near the $20,000 bud­get that we’ve given The Daughter.

There are cur­rently three schools on the “Seri­ous Con­tenders” list.  Two are pri­vate schools; the third an in-state pub­lic school [although she hasn’t offi­cially been accepted to this school yet].  One pri­vate school is on the West Coast; the other in the Mid-West.  All are within or close to the $20,000 annual budget.

The work of writ­ing the essay(s) and the chaos of coor­di­nat­ing all of the rec­om­men­da­tions and tran­scripts is done; the excite­ment of receiv­ing those first few accep­tance let­ters is over; the thrill and incred­i­ble sense of val­i­da­tion (for her) and pride (for me) of receiv­ing some very gen­er­ous schol­ar­ship offers will hope­fully linger a long time.  The stage that is just upon us is that of panic mixed with just a touch of fear:  now comes the process of actu­ally mak­ing the deci­sion as to which school to attend.

Nat­u­rally I don’t know exactly how The Daugh­ter feels right now but I can assure you that I’m feel­ing plenty myself.  First, I’m so incred­i­bly grate­ful for hav­ing fol­lowed my gut in encour­ag­ing her to apply to pri­vate col­leges and not just assum­ing that we could only afford in-state pub­lic schools.  She might very well end up at a state school but at least she has the option of choos­ing a pri­vate school.  With the offers she has received, the dif­fer­ence in cost could be as lit­tle as $4,000 per year (and maybe even less) — that’s cal­cu­lated on ini­tial schol­ar­ship offers, there are still com­pet­i­tive schol­ar­ships she might win or other nego­ti­a­tions to be made that could bring the dif­fer­ence in cost down to a neg­li­gi­ble amount.

Sec­ond, I’m feel­ing pretty over­whelmed with the com­plex­ity and mag­ni­tude of the deci­sion ahead of her.  On the one hand, not only is it her deci­sion to make but I’m uniquely unqual­i­fied to offer any assis­tance.  The Hus­band, as the money-maker and bill-payer and the one with pre­vi­ous expe­ri­ence hav­ing already sent three chil­dren through col­lege, is the one who has set the bud­get.  If he’s set it, I know that the num­ber is both gen­er­ous and firm.  Plus he has the expe­ri­ence of hav­ing him­self attended col­lege full time and hav­ing grad­u­ated.  Sure, I’ve taken plenty of col­lege courses, even attend­ing full-time for a while, but not straight out of high school.  I didn’t do the whole appli­ca­tion process, didn’t attend straight out of high school, didn’t do the “dorm life” thing, and I never graduated.

So, what hap­pens next?  Now she vis­its cam­puses again.  Alone and for longer peri­ods of time while school is in ses­sion so she can get a bet­ter feel­ing for the kids, the cam­pus, the fac­ulty, the admin­is­tra­tion, the over­all expe­ri­ence.  A rep from the Mid-West school called a few days ago about their Com­pet­i­tive Schol­ar­ship week­end (as you might have noticed in last night’s Daily Dol­lar post­ing, I’ve just bought her plane ticket).  I can’t go with her because I have fam­ily in town that week­end but it’s good for her to go alone any­way — good prac­tice for her and a good impres­sion for the school.  Inde­pen­dence and ini­tia­tive are things that col­lege admin­is­tra­tors love to see in students.

The other evening The Daugh­ter came home from school and started gen­tly danc­ing around the sub­ject of vis­it­ing the West Coast col­lege again and I quickly put her at ease by say­ing that I thought it imper­a­tive that she visit all of the cam­puses of schools she is seri­ously con­sid­er­ing.  It’s a nec­es­sary expense and hope­fully cheap insur­ance against a very expen­sive mis­take of choos­ing a school that she ulti­mately hates.

The other thing she needs to do is delve a lit­tle deeper into the nitty gritty of what the schools actu­ally offer and what she wants.  For exam­ple, since the whole for­eign exchange thing didn’t pan out at her high school and a for­eign immer­sion semes­ter in col­lege is very impor­tant to her (she plans to minor or pos­si­bly dou­ble major in Span­ish), what does each school offer in the way of study abroad pro­grams?  She doesn’t want to run into what turns out to be more empty promises.  Also, addi­tional expenses will be a seri­ous con­sid­er­a­tion.  Will she be expected to pay extra tuition for study abroad?  How much of the coor­di­na­tion will they help her do?  How many stu­dents do they send abroad (in other words, is this some­thing they have a lot of expe­ri­ence with)?  How var­ied are the expe­ri­ences offered?  [That was the big issue at her high school; they send plenty of kids to Ger­many but she wanted to go to a Span­ish speak­ing coun­try and they sim­ply didn’t have the con­nec­tions in place to make it happen.]

Another thing to check out is the dou­ble major issue.  Some schools make dou­ble major­ing much “eas­ier” than oth­ers.  At some schools, dou­ble major­ing is a dif­fi­cult process that makes grad­u­a­tion in 4 years impossible.

Hon­estly, some­how the Mid-West school appeals more to me.  How­ever, the West Coast school seems to have very well estab­lished pro­grams both for stu­dents who want to pur­sue for­eign immer­sion oppor­tu­ni­ties and for those who wish to dou­ble major.  Can the Mid-West school mea­sure up?  But then the Mid-West school is offer­ing this oppor­tu­nity to com­pete for addi­tional schol­ar­ship funds and they’re pay­ing a chunk of her travel expenses and tak­ing care of accom­mo­da­tions.  Does the West Coast school offer any­thing sim­i­lar?  And will they help cover travel and assure me that she’ll be picked up and deliv­ered to the air­port and well taken care of in-between?  And don’t for­get about the in-state school.  The Daughter’s high school coun­selor seems con­vinced that some type of aca­d­e­mic schol­ar­ship will be forth­com­ing.  Will it be big enough to entice her?  We can’t for­get to com­pare the state school in cost com­par­isons — what are the chances of not being able to grad­u­ate in 4 years (this issue is becom­ing more and more preva­lent at state schools where stu­dents sim­ply can’t get into the classes they need to grad­u­ate) much less being able to dou­ble major in 4 years?  And how would tuition work dur­ing a study abroad semes­ter — that is if they even offer that option?  I cer­tainly don’t want to get sucked into a school that looks less expen­sive only to find lots of hid­den costs.

Just as with every other aspect of par­ent­ing and all of the stages through which The Daugh­ter has pro­gressed up to this point — the work is never done; there’s always a new worry just around the cor­ner; as soon as one ques­tion is answered another larger one pops up.  Oh, and she just keeps get­ting more and more expen­sive ;-)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
Posted in General Stuff-of-Life | Tagged , | Leave a comment